If you want an account, contact Ziggy via Discord: @ziggymoncher_. Read BonziPEDIA:Requesting accounts for more details.
BonziPEDIA:Quality Control: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
|||
| (3 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
'''Quality Control''' is a program started by the administrators of this wiki. The goal is to maintain quality within the wiki by deleting everything unreadable, irrelevant, spammy, or just shit - pages that are quite shit but not enough for deletion will be marked for rewrite. | '''Quality Control''' is a program started by the administrators of this wiki. Unfortunately 90% of BonziPEDIA editors are retarded brown kiddieniggies with no English skills, so it just can't be good if left unmonitored. The goal is to maintain quality within the wiki by deleting everything unreadable, irrelevant, spammy, or just shit - pages that are quite shit but not enough for deletion will be marked for rewrite. | ||
And no, putting '''<nowiki>{{{stub}}}</nowiki>''' or '''<nowiki>{{{community}}}</nowiki>''' on a one sentence 'literal who' page will not salvage it. | And no, putting '''<nowiki>{{{stub}}}</nowiki>''' or '''<nowiki>{{{community}}}</nowiki>''' on a one sentence 'literal who' page will not salvage it. | ||
== When is it shit: Common tropes == | |||
=== "Bad Article" === | |||
'''[[Bad Article]]''' is an example of the kind of dogshit being forcibly pushed out in the hundreds every day. These kind of articles have no chance to ever become good. | |||
=== "'''NEW INFORMATION DISCOVERED: ...'''" === | |||
Not bad objectively but gets very repetitive and annoying real fast. Kiddietards will usually include some bullshit about MediaNegroTaco1234567890 posting LAY PORN FOR THE 87321965321598235TH TIME OMGGGGGGG!!!!! If you really want to break news into your article, use '''<nowiki>{{{alert}}}</nowiki>''' instead. | |||
=== "(X)fag" === | |||
Kiddies trying to be tuff will resort to affixing "-fag" onto every possible subject of hyperobsession and pretend its a real term that they did NOT just pull out of their asses. This trope is usually used within the following formulaic phrase: "''He likes (X), that makes him a (X)fag''". | |||
This does not apply to the ''established'' -fag terms such as "GoFag" and "objectfag". | |||
=== Poor man's redirect === | |||
A common trope on articles with lists of some form. Poor man's redirects are born when an editor is a fat lazy nigtard who can't be bothered to type a single-sentence brief description of a thing if it just so happens to already have a page on this site. | |||
This in turn leads them to instead shit out a single little autistic link leading to said article most often captioned something along the lines "[[Shit nobody cares about|there's already an article about that]]". | |||
Like with most of the other tropes, using that doesn't necessarily make the article itself shit, but it still drags down the article's quality. | |||
== What's to be done == | == What's to be done == | ||
| Line 11: | Line 30: | ||
** If article is on a user, either write an article or redirect it to a user page, if they've got one. | ** If article is on a user, either write an article or redirect it to a user page, if they've got one. | ||
** Deletion if its just too bad. | ** Deletion if its just too bad. | ||
[[Category:Policy]] | |||
Latest revision as of 03:57, 16 November 2024
Quality Control is a program started by the administrators of this wiki. Unfortunately 90% of BonziPEDIA editors are retarded brown kiddieniggies with no English skills, so it just can't be good if left unmonitored. The goal is to maintain quality within the wiki by deleting everything unreadable, irrelevant, spammy, or just shit - pages that are quite shit but not enough for deletion will be marked for rewrite.
And no, putting {{{stub}}} or {{{community}}} on a one sentence 'literal who' page will not salvage it.
When is it shit: Common tropes
"Bad Article"
Bad Article is an example of the kind of dogshit being forcibly pushed out in the hundreds every day. These kind of articles have no chance to ever become good.
"NEW INFORMATION DISCOVERED: ..."
Not bad objectively but gets very repetitive and annoying real fast. Kiddietards will usually include some bullshit about MediaNegroTaco1234567890 posting LAY PORN FOR THE 87321965321598235TH TIME OMGGGGGGG!!!!! If you really want to break news into your article, use {{{alert}}} instead.
"(X)fag"
Kiddies trying to be tuff will resort to affixing "-fag" onto every possible subject of hyperobsession and pretend its a real term that they did NOT just pull out of their asses. This trope is usually used within the following formulaic phrase: "He likes (X), that makes him a (X)fag".
This does not apply to the established -fag terms such as "GoFag" and "objectfag".
Poor man's redirect
A common trope on articles with lists of some form. Poor man's redirects are born when an editor is a fat lazy nigtard who can't be bothered to type a single-sentence brief description of a thing if it just so happens to already have a page on this site.
This in turn leads them to instead shit out a single little autistic link leading to said article most often captioned something along the lines "there's already an article about that".
Like with most of the other tropes, using that doesn't necessarily make the article itself shit, but it still drags down the article's quality.
What's to be done
- Delete spam.
- NOTE FOR OTHER ADMINS: Look into deleting some talk pages, since those are usually leftovers from raids and bear no value.
- Delete low quality pages on nobodies.
- For pages on relevant topics with stubby one-liners:
- Write a full article.
- If article is on a user, either write an article or redirect it to a user page, if they've got one.
- Deletion if its just too bad.
